Dynasty · seat of the Sisodias at Chittor, then Udaipur

Mewar — the Sisodia house

Alone among the great Rajput houses, the Sisodia ranas of Mewar refused matrimonial alliance with the Mughal imperial house — a refusal Tod records as holding from Rana Pratap's generation to the close of Mughal rule, and one that survived even Rana Amar Singh's submission to Jahangir.

Draft. This entry is an unreviewed first draft. It has not yet been checked by a subject reviewer — see sources and method.

Refusal of Mughal marriage alliance

Alone among the princely houses of Rajasthan, the Sisodias of Mewar declined the marriage alliances with the Mughal throne that bound Amber, Marwar and the lesser houses to Delhi. William Crooke's 1920 edition of James Tod's Annals records that when "every prince in Rajasthan (that of Bundi alone excepted)" had given daughters to the Mughal house, Rana Pratap "renounced all alliance with those who were thus degraded," refusing intermarriage not only with the imperial house but "even with their brother princes of Marwar and Amber," a refusal Tod says held "to the very close of the monarchy of the Moguls." Tod further records that Marwar and Amber later petitioned, "even while basking in court favour," to be readmitted to marriage with Mewar — "to be purified," "to be regenerated," "to be made Rajputs" — on condition of abjuring the practice that had disunited the houses "for more than a century" (Tod/Crooke, Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, vol. I, p. 390).

The distinction survived Mewar's own submission to the empire. When Rana Amar Singh made terms with Jahangir, the settlement his son Karan Singh administered preserved Mewar's separateness: exemption from personal attendance at court, and the imperial farman received "without the walls of his capital" — a mark, Tod writes, meant "more strongly to mark their dependent condition." No marriage clause of the kind binding Amber and Marwar to the Mughal court appears among these terms (Tod/Crooke, vol. I, p. 428).

Connected to

Sources