A contrast to Nasikh
Ātish's family had come from Delhi to Faizabad in the time of Nawab Shuja-ud-Daula. Saksena's history records that he "was born in Fyzabad," and that "His father died when Atish was merely a boy and hence his education was neglected and he became a 'Banka'" (Saksena 1927, p. 111). Taken into the service of Nawab Muhammad Taqi, he was brought to Lucknow, where he watched the poetical combats of Insha and Mushafi and began submitting his own early verses to Mushafi for correction.
Saksena sets his manner directly against that of his great rival: "In his life, as in his writings Atish was a contrast to Nasikh... He dressed himself like a soldier and carried a sword with him even in poetical assemblies," and "He never lowered himself by making requests or writing panegyrics in praise of nobles or nawabs" (Saksena 1927, p. 111). He lived, the book adds, "in an old tumble down house, in a poor style, like a fakir."
Ranked after Mir and Ghalib — and two death dates
Saksena's verdict on the verse itself is unambiguous: "Atish writes like fire as his nom de plume signifies... He ranks foremost amongst Urdu writers of ghazals after Mir and Ghalib" (Saksena 1927, p. 112). But the same book cannot agree with itself on when its subject died. A margin gloss on p. 111 reads "Atish, died 1263 A. H. 1846 A. D." — the year modern accounts repeat (Wikipedia, 2026, gives 1846) — while the body text one page later states instead: "Atish died in 1243 A. H. (1823 A. D.) leaving a host of pupils some of whom attained the rank of a master" (Saksena 1927, p. 112).
Neither printed Hijri year converts cleanly to the Gregorian year set beside it, and the book leaves its own contradiction unreconciled on its own pages — a death date printed twice, disagreeing with itself, in the one Anglophone history most likely to be a reader's first stop.